an exploration into the debates over hadd and ta‘zīr

نویسندگان
چکیده

the essential difference between hadd and ta‘zīr has long been accepted in islamic penal system. based on a study of the holy texts and the statements of the scholars it can be asserted that the rule according to which ‘the type and size of the hadd is defined by the legislator, whereas the type and amount of the ta‘zīr would only be determined by the islamic ruler’ is not comprehensive and lacks universality. hence, the jurists have not reached a consensus about crimes including sexual intercourse with the wife in ramadan, apostasy, corruption on earth, and etc. in terms of their hadd or ta‘zīr punishments. therefore, according to the rule ‘ta‘zīr punishments should be lower than the hadd’, it can be stated that for the ta‘zīr offenses similar to hadd violations, the size of punishment must be smaller than the hadd. however, this rule does not apply to the new crimes. consequently, based on the rule ‘ta‘zīr punishments are those decided by the rulers,’ and due to the universality of the term ta‘zīr, and for the best benefit and interest of the islamic society, and with the goal of eradicating corruption from the earth, the islamic rulers can freely determine the type and amount of punishment.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

an exploration into the criterion for dividing the jurists into akhbārī and uṣūlī

dividing the jurists into akhbārī (traditionist) and uṣūlī (legal theorist) is the most important division that dichotomizes the imāmī jurists into two groups. in jurisprudential and legal (uṣūlī) books, there are many instances of characterizing a jurist as akhbārī or uṣūlī, but what is important in this division is the criterion for this division. what is manifested in the first place as the ...

متن کامل

an investigation into the impact of m-game-enhanced blended module of teaching and learning on iranian students english literacy skills and subskills learning

پژوهش حاضر با پیوند رسانه های قدیمی و جدید یاد دهی و یادگیری _طرح داستان و بازی های همراه ــ در یک پو دمان ترکیبی، در صدد قیاس شیوه ی یاد دهی و یادگیری مبتنی بر بازی مهارت های فرعی و اصلی واژگان، خواندن و نوشتار سواد انگلیسی با شیوه های مرسوم آن بود. به این منظور با کاربرد یک طرح سه گانه همراه با الگوی نظام آموزشی (تومی، 2010)، بازی های از پیش ساخته شده و بومی قابل عرضه از طریق ارتباطات سیّار (ب...

an investigation into translation of cultural concepts by beginner and advance student using think – aloud protocols

this research aims at answering the questions about translation problems and strategies applied by translators when translating cultural concepts. in order to address this issue, qualitative and quantitative study were conducted on two groups of subjects at imam reza international university of mashhad. these two groups were assigned as beginner and advanced translation students (10 students). ...

an investigation into iranian teachers consistency and bias in evaluation of students writings

while performance-based language assessment has led to an increased authenticity and content validity in the practice of writing assessment, the reliability of ratings has become a major issue. research findings have shown different reactions by native english speaker (nes) and non-native english speaker (nns) teachers to students’ writings. the focus of this study is on investigating whether i...

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
فقه و اصول

جلد ۴۷، شماره ۲۲، صفحات ۹-۰

کلمات کلیدی

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023